Skip to main content

Steel · Reference

EN 10025 Steel Grades Comparison Singapore

How EN 10025 structural steel grades S235 to S500 compare on yield strength, tensile strength, weldability and design-standard treatment — with cross-references to stainless steel and aluminium for Singapore projects.

· By Ezzogenics

Steel sections used for metal fabrication comparison

S235, S275, S355, S420, S460 and S500 Compared

EN 10025 covers six headline structural steel grades, named for their nominal yield strength in MPa at thickness ≤16 mm. Each grade has multiple sub-grades (JR, J0, J2, K2, M/N, ML/NL, Q, QL, QL1) that differ on Charpy impact toughness rather than strength. The grades, the part of EN 10025 that defines them, and their typical applications:

GradeStandard partYield (≤16mm)Tensile range (≤16mm)Typical use
S235EN 10025-2235 MPa360–510 MPaGeneral construction, light frames, secondary structures
S275EN 10025-2275 MPa410–560 MPaBuildings, bridges, light structural frames
S355EN 10025-2355 MPa470–630 MPaHigh-rise, heavy bridges, offshore, wind turbines
S420EN 10025-2 / -3 / -4420 MPa520–680 MPaPlate girders, heavy bridges, columns
S460EN 10025-2 / -3 / -4 / -6460 MPa540–720 MPaOffshore, long-span bridges, cranes
S500EN 10025-4 / -6500 MPa590–770 MPaMining machinery, offshore platforms, crane booms

For Singapore work, S275JR and S355JR cover the great majority of fabrication. S235 is increasingly substituted by S275 because the price gap is small. S420 and above tend to appear on heavy civil and offshore projects.

Yield Strength and Tensile Strength by Thickness

Yield strength drops with increasing plate or section thickness. The numbers below are minimum ReH values per EN 10025-2/-3/-4/-6 Table 7:

Thickness bandS235S275S355S420S460S500
≤16 mm235275355420460500
>16–40 mm225265345400440480
>40–63 mm215255335390430440
>63–80 mm215245325370410N/A
>80–100 mm215235315360400N/A
>100–150 mm195225295340380N/A

Tensile strength Rm is given as a min–max range. At ≤16 mm, S275 sits at 410–560 MPa, S355 at 470–630 MPa, and S460 at 540–720 MPa. The full thickness-banded tables and additional ranges are in the EN steel supplement.

Cross-Material Comparison: Carbon Steel, Stainless Steel and Aluminium

EN 10025 does not stand alone — most Singapore projects compare it against EN 10088 stainless steels and EN 573-3 aluminium alloys. The headline differences:

Material familyExample gradeYield / Rp0.2E (GPa)Density (kg/m³)Design code
Carbon steelS275JR275 MPa2107,850EC3 EN 1993-1-1
Carbon steelS355JR355 MPa2107,850EC3 EN 1993-1-1
Stainless steelSS304 (1.4301)210 MPa Rp0.22007,900EC3 EN 1993-1-4
Stainless steelSS316 (1.4401)220 MPa Rp0.22007,980EC3 EN 1993-1-4
Stainless steel2205 Duplex450 MPa Rp0.22007,800EC3 EN 1993-1-4
Aluminium6082-T6 plate ≤12.5 mm255 MPa702,700EC9 EN 1999-1-1
Aluminium6061-T6276 MPa692,700EC9 EN 1999-1-1
Aluminium5083-H111 (marine)125 MPa702,660EC9 EN 1999-1-1

Two design subtleties matter here:

  • Partial safety factor. Carbon steel uses γM0 = 1.00; stainless and aluminium use γM0 = 1.10. So a stainless section needs to be roughly 25% bigger than the carbon steel equivalent to deliver the same design strength.
  • Heat-affected zone (HAZ). Aluminium loses around 50% of proof strength locally at welds, and EC9 §6.1.6 requires a ρhaz factor in design. Carbon steel and austenitic stainless do not need this reduction.

Weldability, Design Standards and Cost Checks

Carbon equivalent value (CEV) drives the welding rule book. The maximum CEV permitted by EN 10025 climbs with grade:

GradeCEV maxWeldabilityPreheat indication (t > 25 mm)PWHT
S2350.35ExcellentNone / slightNot required
S2750.40Excellent~100°CNot required
S3550.45Good100–150°CNot required
S4200.47Good150°CConsult spec
S4600.53Moderate150–200°CSometimes
S5000.56Moderate200°CSometimes

Final preheat and PWHT requirements should be checked against project requirements by the welding engineer or QP where required. CEV alone does not capture every welding consideration — section thickness, hydrogen control and ambient conditions matter too.

On cost, the EN steel supplement carries indicative material prices and a cost-per-MPa-yield ratio. As a rough guide for Singapore fabrication budgets:

  • Mild steel S275 sets the cost baseline (1×).
  • Galvanised mild steel adds roughly 25–30% for the zinc coat.
  • SS304 sits at roughly 3× per kg, but design-strength is lower so the practical cost-per-MPa is closer to ~3×.
  • SS316L is around 4× per kg.
  • Aluminium 6061/6082 sits at roughly 2.3× per kg, with much lower density so per-metre weight is lower.

Download the Steel Comparison Workbook

Our EN Steel Comparison Technical Supplement carries the full set of tables — yield, tensile, weldability, cross-material, weight, cost and platform load — plus a downloadable Excel workbook with the same data, anchor-bolt cross-references and integrated calculators. The supplement is the canonical source for the numbers summarised on this page.

Request a quotation All technical articles